5.4.17
संख्यायाः क्रियाभ्यावृत्तिगणने कृत्वसुच्
Operational rule vidhi
The affix कृत्वसुच् is added to a numeral when the repetition of such an action is to be counted.
Word by word (padaccheda)
Left context संख्यायाः pañcamī · ekavacanaRight context क्रिया- अभ्यावृत्तिगणने saptamī · ekavacanaSubstitute / term कृत्व prathamā · ekavacana
- Left context Pañcamī (5th case): "after X", the operation applies to what follows (1.1.67 तस्मादित्युत्तरस्य). Also used for limits and sources.
- Right context Saptamī (7th case): "when X follows", the operation applies to what precedes (1.1.66 तस्मिन्निति निर्दिष्टे पूर्वस्य). Also a condition or domain ("in the sense of").
- Substitute / term Prathamā (1st case): in operational rules, the substitute or the thing introduced; in definitions, the term or its referent.
Dotted words are technical terms. Hover or tap one to see its card.
Pink letters are it-markers (anubandhas), tags dropped by 1.3.9. Hover or tap one for the rule that marks it, or try the it-letter finder.
Full reading
संख्यायाः क्रिया- अभ्यावृत्तिगणने कृत्वसुच्
Pāṇini leaves out words that carry over from earlier sūtras. Expand to see the rule as a reader actually understands it.
Commentary
The affix कृत्वसुच् is added to a numeral when the repetition of such an action is to be counted.
This is also a svartha affix. The word अभ्यावृत्तिः means "again and again or repetition". The counting of actions belonging to the same class and having the same agent, which occur again and again is called क्रियाभ्यावृत्तिगणनम् ॥ Thus पंचवारान् भुङ्क्ते = पंचकृत्वोभुक्तं "he eats five times". So also सप्तकृत्वः &c.
Why do we say "after a Numeral"? Observe भूरीन् वारान् भुंक्ते "he eats many times".
Objection:- Why do we say "action" when we know that an 'action' alone can be repeated, and not a substance or an attribute? Reply: The word क्रिया is employed in this sutra for the sake of the next sutras, into which its anuvritti flows. Thus in sutra 5.4.19, एकस्य सकृच्च when the affix does not apply to count repetition, because it is impossible for a unit to express repetition; but merely to count the "action" only.
Why do we use the word "repetition"? The affix will not apply when merely "actions" are counted. Thus पंचपाकाः "five cookings", दशपाकाः &c.
Why do we use the word "counting", when we know that a Numeral is nothing but counting ? Had the sutra been merely संख्यायाः क्रियाभ्यावृत्तौ कृत्वसुच्, there would arise this anomaly. The numerals upto ten denote only the thing numbered (संख्येय), but the numerals above those denote both the counting (संख्यान) and the thing counted (संख्येय) ॥ If गणन were not used, the affix would come only after the numeral denoting sankhyeya and not sankhyana. Thus it will apply to शतवारान् भुङ्क्ते = शतकृत्वः, but not here शतं वाराणां भुङ्क्ते; because here the word शत does not denote repetition, but merely a counting. By using the word गणन it applies to both.
Śrīśa Chandra Vasu, The Ashtadhyayi of Panini (1897), via ashtadhyayi.com.